Feed on
Posts
Comments

Monthly Archive for October, 2011

Reasons for the Attractiveness of Neoclassical Economics Yes, Joachim Spangenberg is certainly right when – with Christian Arnsperger and Yanis Varoufakis in mind – he points to methodological individualism, methodological instrumentalism and the methodological equilibrium axiom. And of course I completely agree with Peter Söderbaum when he stresses the historical background of neoclassical economics. Another […]

Read Full Post »

In relation to the first question, I see neoclassical economics’ strength based on two pillars. The first pillar relates to the fact that science, knowledge, technology, social organisation and environment have all co-evolved around fossil hydrocarbons in such a way that it gave neoclassical framework a particular advantage. Above all, our technological basis has been […]

Read Full Post »

Peter Söderbaum: Introduction

Please see: http://ifg.rosalux.de/files/2011/10/RLF28October2011S%C3%B6derbaumIntroductory-remarks13.pdf (Because of a technical mismanagement you have to copy the link and to pave it into the web address line.)

Read Full Post »

Please see: http://ifg.rosalux.de/files/2011/10/Why-neoclassical-economics-is-attractive1.pdf Workshop introduction  Adam Smith as a pluralist and/or institutionalist The constructs Smith set forth and later developed by his successors largely define how we meet “needs” and what we value and discount. Of all the constructs we use in the course of our work, this economic model is clearly the most powerful. […]

Read Full Post »

1.       What makes neoclassical economics attractive? What are its strengths based on? First issue to be discussed: Is it at all important to discuss alternative economic theories? Why not use a more direct approach to present environmental and other problems followed by proposals for action? Sustainability issues can no doubt be approached in many ways […]

Read Full Post »